PROCEEDING IN REM AGAINST THE VESSEL M.T. PORTOFINO versus M.T. PORTOFINO
Sections 4 and 5 of the Admiralty Suit Plaintiff petitioned the High Court admissibility jurisdiction against the plaintiff by an action in a remote connection that documentary evidence shows that the proposed defendant was the vessel's owner who filed a written statement Therefore, his presence in the court was necessary for a proper decision so that a person could be prosecuted in the event of a loss, loss of life or personal injury as a result of the collision. The contention of the contention is that since the written statement from the vessel was filed by the defendant, it was submitted to the jurisdiction of the court and thus should be asked to appear in court and it should be filed by the defendant. Excluded
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Renala Khurd lawyer
