MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus THE STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 324 / 337F (ii) / 34 bail, grant of further investigation, on the occasion the presence of the 7mm rifle accused was disclosed in the FIR, But his name was taken. The accused accused in the crime was acknowledged in the role of Lalakar, but did not hurt him despite being allegedly armed with 30 bore pistols. Nothing was recovered from the suspect. His co-accused, in an attempt to assassinate the complainant's brother and cause harm to another, needs further investigation. The case of the accused was included under section (2) of section 497, CRP. The suspects were behind the bars of the jail about 3/2 of the time. In the case of months and previous offenders, they were entitled to bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Lahore lawyer
