KHALID MAHMOOD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Section 65 and (59) (2) Second Establishment of the Federal Tax Ombudsman's Ordinance (List of Thousands Eleven) Assessed property of gifted to the sons of the accused by his uncle to the complainant / assessee. There is no provision in the Income Tax Ordinance. In 1979, a taxpayer was obliged to explain the conduct of his sons or his mothers, which the Income Tax Authorities could do legally. , This was to describe the sources from which he initially purchased the shops. Failed to specify the source of the investment, explain The investment made can be considered a "considered income" in its hands. Reopening the Complainant / Issuer's Review was absolutely irrelevant and unlawful consequential mismanagement. The Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended taking notice under Section 65. The repealed Income Tax Ordinance 1979 for 1997 98 98 and 2001 2002 should be withdrawn
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
