Find a Lawyer

I.T.A. NO.2350/KB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 13TH MAY 2002 versus I.T.A. NO.2350/KB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 13TH MAY 2002

The matters sought by the Assessing Officer from the Section 156 Error Assessment Officer, in which case the first appellate authority had already pronounced its judgment, were not appropriate if the fact of the first appellate order was factual or in error of law. If necessary, then correction is necessary. The authority, the proper way, was to seek correction from this authority as the original application filed by the SCC was ineligible, the appeal was also ineligible and the same was dismissed by the appellate tribunal. online advocate from Utror lawyer