Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZAMAN versus NAZIR AHMED

Section 8 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Arts 142 and 144 suits for possession, trial for controversial occupation, trial court's request for a trial court prohibits the plaintiff from becoming a landlord And the defendant rejected the negative possession request. The appellate court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal. The plaintiff of reasonableness had not before the appellate court or the High Court questioned the trial court's findings regarding the plaintiff's adverse possession and plaintiff's request for ownership because the plaintiff did not prove her possession. Under Article 144 of the Limitation Act, 1908, at the beginning of the demarcation point, when the defendant's possession was against the plaintiff, the finding of the courts was that the defendant's possession was not a negative matter, therefore, the courts were without jurisdiction. Powers of action. Finding a lawsuit to prevent a lawsuit under time restriction, the defendant's possession will not be negative, no matter what the length, the difference in quashing the plaintiff's title will not be the same as long as he holds the title to the plaintiff, He would be entitled to take possession of the land on the basis of title, the High Court accepted the review request, keeping the unwanted decisions / orders aside and ruling on the plaintiff's case. registration advocate from Larkana lawyer