Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISHAQ MUHAMMAD ALTAF versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section (66 (?) (c), 59, & 54, and establishment of the Office of the Federal 96 Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) In some cases the assessment threshold returns to self-review) Evaluation of the K-Order was made time-barred, concluding that the return of income was accepted under Section 59 of the Income-tax Ordinance 1979, under the law, which implies that no tax The amount is also paid, which exceeds the liability recognized under section 54. Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, on the request of the Complainant / Assisi Department was made non-refundable. Z will be finalized in the shortest time in accordance with the law and the facts. It was not possible in the law except to prepare IT 30. Displaying a refund for posting in the relevant records - such Denied, the corruption was manifested in several dimensional ways (() inability to timely delay the assessment; (b) attention to the Complainant / Assisi correspondence in relation to the payment of the received refund, respectively. TRO is through letters received through letters from ITOs and CITs. (c) Damage record Some part of the record, some of which was classified classified permanent all were all acts that were inadvertently betrayed. advocate from Talagang lawyer