Find a Lawyer

MST. TAYYIBA SHEHZADI versus ASAD ALI SHAH

Section 5 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for termination of marriage on the basis of divorce / On the case of the plaintiff (husband) to sue for dissolution of marriage by the plaintiff (wife), the Family Court has granted the marriage. Was dissolved on the basis of the shell. ??? Defendant is required to return 12 pieces of gold jewelry that was allegedly given to her by the plaintiff at the time of marriage and the decree passed by the Family Court was maintained by the appellate court under the plaintiff. And refused to receive the gold jewelry from her. The defendant (her husband), as she claimed, had no mention of any ornaments or any other item against the columns provided for the purpose in the marriage, to prove that the plaintiff had no independent assistant or The best evidence was not even presented to the plaintiff as ornaments. The plaintiff was not prepared to receive the said jewelry by the plaintiff and she was able to establish her right to dissolve the marriage on the complaint. Thus the courts below could not dissolve the marriage on the basis of khula when there was no demand for the return of the benefits received by the plaintiff (the spouse) during the marriage by the plaintiff (husband). And when the courts failed to create any. At this point, the courts' current decisions below to dissolve the marriage on the basis of the issue were not only void, but invalid, unfair and based on a misrepresentation of evidence. Judging the affairs of Out of hatred against the plaintiff (wife) and her husband, beyond their jurisdiction, their harmonious decision divorce advocates from Khair Pur lawyer