Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus ABDUL JABBAR

Section 13 and 17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The objection to the order to dismiss the constitutional petition was finally granted against the tenant after it was ordered to vacate the shop, the petitioner, who is the defendant / The landlord was not a tenant, filed an objection. In which he claimed that part of his occupation was not part of the shop that was ordered to vacate, but it was an independent portion that was leased to him. Was deleted by the rental controller simultaneously. The executing court and the appellate authority had failed to furnish the applicant / objection notice of any rent, process of rent or receipt which the respondents process through the applicants, it was self-evident that the applicant This place is actually part of the shop in which the evacuation was ordered. It was granted that the possession of the applicant was entirely a part of the shop on which something was extracted. The order was passed down to the Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority. The reasonable facts regarding the facts were rightly excluded that the applicant was not the tenant of the respondent and he was not in the section of the disputed shop and not his. Any independent shop was based on competent reasoning whose courts have neither exceeded the jurisdiction nor acted in jurisdiction. Under its constitutional jurisdiction, the courts' unanimous decisions were passed by the High Court. Cannot be interrupted list of advocates from Patoki lawyer