HAJI NISAR AHMED versus MUHAMMAD MURAD
Section 2302/392 / Constitution 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), section 185 The appeal against the complainant's bad story does not appear to be valid, convincing or understandable. On the defense that some columns of the Inquest report were left blank and were not filled up, this argument was supported by the prosecution's witness, who, after taking the oath before the trial court, dismissed the same. done. The direction from which the accused came to the victim was not mentioned, which was aided by the evidence of the prosecution's witness at the trial. The incident took place at 7.30pm and the sun rose at 6pm to 6am on the respective days as the darkness prevailed, so the possibility of mistaken identity of the attackers could not be ruled out. The medical report stated that an outbreak with a pulmonary vessel that exploded with the right lung was sufficient to cause death, and medical evidence did not confirm the account. If the deceased was remotely employed by a prosecution witness, his wounds should have been blackened and tattooed. The trial court's finding was not based on a reasonable definition of the evidence, but was rejected by the medical evidence. The prosecution's witnesses belonged to the deceased and there was no independent prosecution of their testimony, nor was there any circumstantial evidence linking the accused to the commission of the crime, and the motive for the recovery was not proved. The report clearly indicated that they were ready. After deliberation and consultation in which the names of the accused were not mentioned
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Washuk lawyer