Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR ALI versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) denied the service and new inquiry was made, the second inquiry officer waived off the official employee of the charges, the appellate authority another to investigate the report of another inquiry officer. Appointed the officer and on the recommendation of another officer, the civil servant was dismissed, the service tribunal upheld the dismissal order by the civil servant, Pliya opted for the second officer on whose recommendation he was dismissed. Had been appointed as an Inquiry Officer other than the Inquiry Officer But he was deployed to investigate the report. Inquiries to the Appellate Author's Appeal Author The report pending before the Department for proper disposal of the appeal related to the record in this report made by another officer identified the contents and evidence available on the record. Was ignored, another inquiry officer dismissed a civil servant. In deciding this appeal, consider the evidence and material considerations in your report by the other officer, the appellate authority did not commit any illegal action, the appellate authority found on the basis of another inquiry officer He is fully qualified to rule out the consequences, resulting in inequality. Reading or misrepresenting the record was denied by the department, authorities and the tribunal, as well as permission to appeal the record of the facts recorded in the appeal. ask a advocate free from Punch lawyer