PK MUHAMMAD versus KARACHI BUILDING CONTROL AUTHORITY
Section 42 & ti 55 The plaintiff's legal role in determining the plaintiff, who claims himself to be an old tenant on the lower floor of the building, filed a lawsuit against the notice by the Building Control Authority that the said building The structure had an effect. Damaged and dangerous and beyond repair and directed that the ground floor of the building be removed as soon as it fails, which will cause the plaintiff to act without notice at the risk and cost of the plaintiff by the Building Control Authority. However, the tenant was at risk of disposing of the property, which was the natural consequence of demolishing the lower floor of the building to the tenant in his possession, in which case, it was within his rights that such action be taken. Challenge the legality of Rupert could not evict his tenant from a tenant property, except in the case of a tenant or lawful occupier, by the building authority to file a declaration and permanent injunction, even by filing a lawsuit for the AP landlord. It had the legal role prescribed under the Spec, Special Relief Act, 1877 to protect its possession and the case was remanded without legal action. Lower court to deal with the law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
