GUL HASSAN versus THE STATE
An unidentified person was reported in the FIR of Section 497 (2) Contempt of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/201/34/114 bail, further investigation but the prosecution's witnesses stated in the statement The person was an accused then an identity test conducted by the prosecution's witnesses would bring the case to further scrutiny, it was alleged that he had armed with a gun, but he had been arrested in accordance with Section 20, P.P.C. The offense did not use the same role played by the accused and would require constructive responsibility. During the constitutional petition proceedings, the accused and another person were illegally detained by the Road Commissioner who raided the police station and no registrations were found in the registers regarding the arrest of the accused, The accused was kept in prison for a month and a half. The accused, under the circumstances, was admitted on bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Sidhnoti lawyer