PIRAN DITTA versus THE STATE
Further investigation against the accused, section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), section 302/34, was alleged to have prompted his brother / co-accused to shoot at the deceased accordingly. Had died and died on the spot, except to take the place of the victim. Lalkar, the accused had no other role, the question of sharing a common intention with the partner involved in the murder of the victim, the issue of the accused at trial, was covered under section (2). In accordance with the requirements of Section 749 Cr, CRPC, further investigations into his crime were behind the suspect's bars and it was reported that he was a former offender, the defendant was entitled to bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Rabwah lawyer
