Find a Lawyer

AKHLAQ CLOTH, HOUSE, FAISALABAD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 59 (1) CBR Circular No. 4 Date 2001 18 18 2001 Self Assessment Scheme, Para 9 (a) (ii) CBR Circular No. 1/69 / STS / 2002, dated 8 12 2000, paragraph IX CBR Circular C No 1 (8) STS / 2001, Dated 8 6 2002 CBR Circular Letter No. 7 (7) Section Assistant / 2001, 26 26 2002 Survey of Documents of the National Economy Ordinance (XV of 2000) Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV) 2000, Section 9 Self Assessment Returns Returns apart from requesting paragraph 9 (a) (ii) of Circular No. 4 of 2001, 186 of 2001 On the basis that the sale was not announced. According to the Economy Documents Survey profile, agree to sell / unanimously sell. It is claimed that the army-led survey team obtained a sales-signed survey form which was declared illegal and illegal sale, which is in line with the capital. The Department believes that there is more to the Complainant / Assisi case, the possibility of higher returns than previously announced in the return of revenue was not correct, as set out in the guidelines issued by the Central Board of Revenue for selection of matters. None of the criteria were identified to apply to the complainant / reviewer case. The Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended the Central Board of Revenue directly exclude the withdrawal from the list of cases selected for audit under paragraph 9 (a) (ii), and its acceptance under the Self-Assessment Scheme was examined. best advocate from Hattian lawyer