Find a Lawyer

HAJI JATOI versus THE STATE

Section 302 (b) law appeared before Section H of the relevant police station on evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 38, 39 and 40 of the evidence and confessed that one of the deceased was his mother's The daughter was illegitimate. Relations with the other victim and when they saw him in a bed, he slaughtered the confessional statement of the two to the extent of the facts that resulted from it, the law was admissible under Article 40 of the 1984 testimony, otherwise There is no need to discuss the matter, the evidence, because the facts revealed that the location of the incident and the presence of the bodies on the bodies of the accused was the presence of Hecht's wounds on his body, which was confirmed by the defendant's defense. Was not disputed or challenged by. It was recorded 13 days after his arrest, but the delay alone would not affect its apparent value. No time limit was set for recording the judicial confession; it was the only and only validity of the confession. And the truth is, to see that the accused's judicial confession proved to be a crime and the magistrate had recorded the confession of the offender who had no personal interest in the case nor had any ill will towards the accused magistrate who had The certificate was listed. The effect is that after all the formal proceedings the accused's confession was recorded, the confessional statement of the accused was fully consistent with the contentious material facts, especially the date and location of the incident, the details of the accused couple, The nature of the wounds and the weapons used. The defendant's confession was, in these circumstances, voluntary and factual evidence of the doctor who obliged pakistani advocates Gadoon Amazai lawyer