Find a Lawyer

CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AUQAF, SINDH, HYDERABAD versus ALLAH BACHAYO

O VII, R 10 Ordinance of the West Pakistan Civil Courts (III of 1962), Section 24 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 8 jurisdictional judicial return for possession of the suit was filed in the court where H Plant was returned to the plaintiff claiming to present it to the court that since the matter was on TM, the civil court ruled that the order for the return of the plaintiff on this basis. It was challenged, however, that this was the case. Was located on TM, but since Sindh province and two government officials were parties to the matter, the court was asked by TM to bar the section 24 (1) (2) of the Western Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance, 1962. There will be no jurisdiction in the future. The plaintiffs held that the West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance, 1962 being a special law, would revoke the general provisions of section (1) of the Civil Procedure Code 1908 of Section 24 of the West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance, 1962. It is clear that the suits in which Pakistan or any of its provinces or any government official was a party will be restricted to the jurisdiction of this civil court which has no unlimited jurisdiction with respect to the cost of the original case, which means It may be that a court having civil jurisdiction with unlimited permanent jurisdiction was not barred in sub-section (2) of section 24 of the West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance, 1962, which allowed the court to establish such cases in a civil judge. , Which spoke of the value of a plot without the jurisdiction of the original case. As was the case, this place was located in the area of TM advocates from Kunri lawyer