S.-I. KAZI SHAHID ALI versus THE STATE
Section 19 (1) (2) (14), 21, 25 and 32 The summary procedure of contempt of court was charged with being a police officer. He was investigating a criminal case, but he was arrested under section 19 (1). ) Had not completed the investigation within the time provided. The Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, requested the trial court to extend the term of employment, which was approved from time to time. Finally on the relevant date the accused moved another application for extension of tenure which was dismissed and the accused was sentenced at the same time as he was found guilty of non-submission of challan. Within a time, which came under contempt of court under section 19 (2) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, the accused has to file a record of any showcasing notice against him, without charge and without charge, for seven days. Was sentenced to simple imprisonment. Its evidence or statement under section 32 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 was applied to the Anti-Terrorism Court under the provisions of the Criminal Code 1898, if it were not included. According to the provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, a separate procedure was provided in the form of a summary trial under the provisions of Section 21 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, for trial of cases which lasted for more than 6 months. Was not punished. The separate procedure, after being sentenced to simple imprisonment for only seven days, did not apply to CHAP XXII A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, as the Anti-Terrorism Court Sessions Court, criminal The Code of Conduct may seek the provisions of Chapter XXII. List of cases filed in section 21 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 against 1898
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Wah Cantt lawyer