Find a Lawyer

SIKANDR HAYAT versus THE STATE

Section 2302 (b) definition of evidence that deceased three people suffered injuries from sharp weapons It was not possible for one of the accused to kill three people alone because it is natural that the first deceased was reported when he was injured with a knife. The voice goes up and her voice and other crying bodies that are asleep will wake up as the prosecutor's story alleged that only three people had committed the killing of three people, prosecution witnesses said. According to the allegation that it was unnatural and unconstitutional, they had committed extra court confession before them, three months after the incident. The suspects said they had given the drug to the deceased before killing them so that they could not resist. A post-mortem examination on the bodies of three dead bodies revealed no poison. Could not be identified. The prosecution dismissed the prosecutor's case as one of the prosecution's witnesses belonged to one of the deceased. Both extra-judicial confession witnesses did not arrest the accused while making the confession before them. Witnesses did not report to the police nor to the complainant, but they appeared to the police the next day. However, the extra-judicial confession was always regarded as weak evidence that the knife found on the suspect's identity did not stain human blood, according to the report that the serologist's fugitive was not proved on record only. There was no basis for the fugitive to be convicted or retained in the prosecution's story registration advocate from Gadoon Amazai lawyer