Find a Lawyer

M. A. KAREEM IQBAL versus PRESIDING OFFICER, BANKING COURT NO.III

Sections 10 and 22 (1) (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for refusal of the Banking Court to recover the loan amount to challenge such order by constitutional petition on the matter. On the basis of this reason it is clearly illegal and invalid; and in view of the conditions of providing security or deposit of surplus money for the approval of the appeal and the order of stay, this method of appeal was insufficient, inadequate and fraudulent; Therefore, the applicants had the right to be ignored and referred to the High Court within their constitutional jurisdiction. The provisions of section 22 (3) of the Financial Institutions (Maintenance) Ordinance, 2001 were not strict and strict, but were a soft and easy condition for the offer of security, for which the High Court had to give a reasonable order. Will Scope of appellate authority, unnecessary, inadequate and inadequate supply of automatic appeal to the Financial Institutions Section 22 (3) (Recovery of Financial Expansion) Ordinance 2001 Instead of filing a constitutional petition, constraint or obstruction of appeal Not made The finding of a remedy for an appeal provided under the law, especially when the appellate forum was second to none, but the High Court, the iples rejected pakistani advocates Dera Bugti lawyer