Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZULFIQAR versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM

Sections 302/324/337A (ii) / 148/149 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Sections 200 and 202 of the Private Complaint Cross-version FIR under Section 302/324/337A (ii) / 148/149, PPC was filed. Accused of committing murder of the victim and injuring others. In the same incident, the accused party also suffered injuries, a cross version was registered during the investigation of the accused party and the investigation was pending for more than 2 2/3 years. The cross-version of the accused party was falsified, challaned and charged against, the accused also filed a private complaint of the same incident in which the accused's statement was recorded as the complainant. And the matter was referred to the magistrate for investigation under Section 202, CR PC. After the dismissal of the private complaint for the cross-version by the accused, the accused filed a review petition against the dismissal order. Without being dismissed by the trial court, the delay in filing a private complaint could not be termed effective as the cross version was recorded only 26 days after the incident, while the injured witnesses were examined on the same day. In arguing, the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction over which the accused and his accomplices were charged. The case had been facing trial in the murder trial may have an effect on, only to be accused of seeking provisional review of the evidence. The accused may be summoned in a private complaint and if a primary issue arises. Find out from the evidence presented in private complaints property advocate from Sangla Hill lawyer