MUHAMMAD ISHAQ versus THE STATE
The applicant / accused's argument for section 426 preventive code (XLV of 1860), section 302 (b) juvenile justice system ordinance (XXII of 2000), section 4 (4) sentence was that his age was about 1 / It was 2 years at the time of the incident and this fact was mentioned by the trial court in its judgment. In accordance with Section 4 (4) of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000, all the cases before a trial court in which a child has been charged with a crime shall be transferred to the court of competent court judge. As a child, his case should have been transferred to the Juvenile Court and the case should have been tried, but that did not happen, so the plea was accepted by the accused and his sentence was suspended and His appeal was dismissed and he was granted bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Khuzdar lawyer
