Find a Lawyer

FAIZ AHMAD versus THE STATE

Section 2 (2 (b) / 34 34) The definition of proof was immediately filed an FIR and a complaint was lodged at the time, date and place of the incident, which was the father of the deceased girl, even though at trial The statement had died before the recording, but his death had no effect, as the investigating officer said that the FIR was recorded as per the actual Friday by the complainant and that the complaint Was read on the person who marked the thumb in the sign of its accuracy, in the circumstances, was brought to the record by the prosecution in a legitimate way that Introduces the motivation behind the incident and the account of an activist, presented by the deceased's father, and also discusses that two residents of the village witnessed the incident which presented the ocular account. He was a resident of the same village. It can be emphasized that the witnesses were witnesses of the occasion because it is the daily life of the villagers here and the prosecution was to remain in the fields there. Submitted an account with the Acular account, but no injuries were attributed to the co-accused and no injuries were attributed to the accused. The statement was made in the statement of Medical Officer Ocular, in which two prosecution witnesses testified to the medical evidence. Only two blank retrievers were recovered from the confines of the accused, which shows that only two fire shots were fired by the accused. Neither weapon was recovered when the attribute was attributed to the co-accused. Available in Medical Evidence ask a advocate free from Cherat lawyer