Find a Lawyer

JAMIL AHMED versus THE STATE

Section 302/449/34 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Section 10 (4) Definition of Evidence, Reduction of Punitive Complaint that Repeated Statement of FIR Eyewitnesses supported this. Prosecutors have fully arrested the ocular evidence presented by an innocent child aged 9-10. The statement said that the innocent child, who had undergone cross-examination for a long time and was examined by the police, could not be easily cleared as he witnessed it himself. Sitting on the victim's chest and holding his hand, the other was administering drugs to the victim who was allegedly seen running out of the house on the suspect's complaint, an independent witness said, an ocular statement presented by the child's witness. Was also corroborated by further prosecution witnesses. And the Lady Doctor who conducted a post-mortem examination of the prosecution witnesses with no motive for the false interference of the accused, with a straightforward, simple and clearly credible presence, as well as the participation of the accused, fully prosecuted. Was proved and the defense was unable to examine the prosecution's evidence, the accused could not establish direct enmity with the victim's father. At the same time, there was no other evidence to prove that the complaining party was under the influence with which the defendants were involved in civil and criminal litigation, along with the complainant or any other witness of the prosecution. During the interrogation, the child's witness was examined and his statement was made under section 161. , CRPC was also registered and law firms from Kallat lawyer