Find a Lawyer

RAFTAR MAHMOOD versus THE STATE

Section 2 (c) / evidence 34 On the basis of the value of the evidence, the version of the prosecution, to the extent that the accused was dragged and hurt by the victim to the victim, was ignored by medical evidence because of the alleged hatchet. No traces of trauma or injury were found on the site. No evidence was provided for the presence of the accused in the site plan, it was speculated that the accused were not present on the spot under the site plan and others on record. The evidence was that the location of the incident did not drop. The description of the manner in which the complainant was being used was described by the accused in the house of the accused. The case should have been presented, but after the prosecution's failure to explain this essential fact, the defense's plea and the action taken by the defense would have to be accepted. The version was that the deceased was trying to take his sister with her sister inside the room at the relevant time. To provoke her politeness in the house and when the accused saw her brother's licensed rifle. Was incensed and fired from the job because of the hai sibling (family honor) the sister of the accused had modified the custody of the accused. In view of the events that led up to the event, u were not convinced, while there is a possibility that the defense version, although it was exaggerated or twisted and there were some facts that were suppressed, the possibility of failure and failure. Will talk about Depending on his case being unarmed and firing it was an overwork even if the question of enclosure involved the delivery of section 302 (c); law websites from Sheikhupura lawyer