Find a Lawyer

RAJA ABDUL LATIF versus SUFI SAKANDAR

324/379/440/427/337 H (ii) 134 Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), Section 249A & 417 (2A) Appeal of trial against evil, trial court automatically approved by Moto What is it. In section 249A, its powers under the CCPC, in the absence of any such petition transferred by the accused, were not lawful, the trial court issued a notice to the complainant and the prosecutor of the FIR Had passed the unforgettable order. The magistrate accepted an opportunity to hear him in a hurry and in an unusual way during the last business day when he had to withdraw from the charge due to his exchange that the investigating officer did not appear in court to support the prosecution's case and the court. He was compelled to take his attendance by taking drastic measures. The prosecution's four witnesses supported the version of the prosecution, which did not investigate through the defendants and their inspection, where the trial court did not observe that the accusation against the accused was baseless or that his conviction in this case was baseless. There was no possibility, the trial court did not send a good reason to support this ruling. The facts and circumstances of the case were passed without proper knowledge of the circumstances, in which case the case of acquittal was set aside and the trial court to hear the trial from this stage. Was made for immigration advocates contact from Dir lawyer