Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM versus THE STATE

Section 2 30b (b) The accused accused and five of his accomplices were named in the FIR, one person was killed and another was injured in the incident. Seven of the accused were acquitted by the trial court. He was sentenced to three and two years while the fifth co-accused was in large numbers and the accused, who was sentenced and sentenced to life imprisonment, was arrested only after his arrest. The victim was on the left leg of the victim, according to a medical report case, indicating that he was acquitted. The co-accused, who was armed with a firearm, fired in the air and injured the dead body with a gun butt on his left leg. The only injury is on the leg of the deceased Syed Company acquitted by the trial court on this basis. It was alleged that the police found the accused's innocent character to the extent that it was said that the accused was better than the accused in the aforementioned case, which was reported to the accompanying accomplice, who was admitted to the doctor for butt injury. Was inserted Or who conducted a medico legal report and post-mortem examination on the body of the deceased. In his entire statement he never said that the injury was fatal, but according to the doctor's opinion, the cause of death was shoulder trauma to the abdomen and complications to his left leg on the deceased. The accused had nothing to do with the death of the accused, the suspect was given the benefit of the doubt and he was acquitted. immigration advocate from Naukundi lawyer