Find a Lawyer

KHAN MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE

Sections 230 ((b), 2) 2 (c), 7 33 FD and 33 337F (V) Define the conviction of evidence, on the day the peas decline, due to the current dispute over agricultural land between the parties. There was flare up and a dispute arose between the two sides. Injuries to fellow suspects were not mentioned in any of the FIRs and the prosecution's witnesses had to confess during the trial as well as the accused decided to suppress the truth. It was rightly concluded that this case was one of the individual liability that was charged. The same offense of the accused is not repeated under Section 302 (b) and the PPC was changed to Section 302 (c), PPC and thereby reduced its sentence. Already, he was imprisoned for 18 years and 8 months and that was enough to achieve justice. The injured witness suffered shoulder injuries in the hands of the accused, resulting in two ribs. The aforesaid witness did not receive any injuries sustained by a sharp weapon or firearm and was not punctured, resulting in the conviction of the accused under section 7 337D, PPC, and instead Section 777F (v), was punished under PPC. And sentenced to five years of RI, both sentences were ordered to run concurrently. famous lower court advocate from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer