Find a Lawyer

ABDUR RAZZAQ ALIAS NANNA versus THE STATE

S: 2 (2 (b) / 34 34) Appreciating the Evidence One of the accused claimed that he was 18 years old when his statement was filed under Section 42 42, CRPC but he was still Could not produce evidence in evidence of his claim `` The court never denied .A accusing him of seeking guidance in his testimony that he intends to present evidence in his defense but to make further statement or to give evidence. No opportunity was provided, it was completely outlawed and dismissed, both witnesses clearly testified that the incident had happened - a hotel that met. The incident that he had rented proved that, unlike the very hotel being run by the deceased and his brothers, the incident occurred at another hotel, with no material support. The record of the incident was called for the repayment of the loan, on which the accused became enraged and heated words were exchanged between them and the complainant complained about the same. That this incident happened for some other reasons, but it will not reduce the attractiveness of the accused's crime does not affect the absence of motive Will horses. There was no direct hostility between the accused and the complainant to any degree which could have prompted the complainant to include the accused in the case, in these circumstances, in this case, I was not involved as they claimed that the accused's involvement. In this case was fully established where the incident occurred was a market and that event best advocate from Larkana lawyer