SECRETARY (SCHOOLS), GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF TIRMAZI
R 4 (a) (ii), (b) (i) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) punishable by a reduction of salaries, reduced expenses in a fixed period and a deliberately absent service tribunal Changed the major to three minor incremental fines. His conviction is justified. Such allegations were not proven by the inclusion of low and tangible evidence that a conviction for a pay reduction in less than a step in the authorized salary The reason for this was that there were financial irregularities. Not serious in nature The scale of the reduction of salaries in the scale given by the competent authority was unlawful because it could be done, but not beyond this lower stage, such penalties would be rightfully the tribunal's minor penalties. Was isolated by Prevention of three increments will lead to the termination of justice, there is no question of involvement in the law of public importance, the Supreme Court dismissed the petition and refused leave of appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
