MESSRS HABIB RAFIQUE versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE, MULTAN
Sections 19, 26, 156 (1) (12), 196 and 196A Section RO 279 (1) / 94, dated 2-4 1994, allowed the Supreme Court to consider the appeal, even if the applicant was hearing. The opportunity was denied and the High Court did not hear whether the applicant could be prosecuted for violation of the provisions of Section RO 279 (1) / 94 after submitting the installation certificate from the Assistant Collector, Central Excise. Is. And whether the penalty imposed on the applicant was irrelevant to the alleged offense against him
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
