OV, RR 15 and 20 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Article 164 Summons, Rules of Service of Alternative Service of Service Rules Service was not appropriate and the services of the defendant were not affected at any stage of the proceedings. (Residing in a separate house) cannot be determined because the plaintiff's legal / personal service was to be rendered personally or the agent was authorized to receive / accept the service Lived by a male member of the KK family. In the same house, if he was not found at the given address and no authorized agent service was implemented by the servants / employees who were not family members then it would be of no importance and only a male member in one house. Lived in As a legitimate service, when the service affects the defendant, the court will have jurisdiction to settle the issue when the purpose of the service on the defendant will be able to resist his claim. The defendant's personal knowledge of the proceedings was unnecessary, only the authorized agent could accept the summons The processor server had to collect the correct information so that the parties' reasonable and personal services could be obtained within a timely manner. The officer had to consider. The service affected by the processor server and the inquiry about the accuracy and accuracy of the same electronic devices should be used to obtain effective service of the parties, the provisions of OV, R 15, the current state of the CPC violated. Was denied in connection with the plaintiff's refusal to sign the summons, nor was the current service official examined by the alternative company
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
