Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFFAR BABAR versus WAQAR AYUB

Sections 114 and AXLVII, R1 Review principles and jurisdictional orders that have jurisdiction to review court orders were subject to certain conditions and were not intended to correct wrong decisions, but to correct errors. The order based on the misconception of the facts could be revised without disregarding the obvious and important thing or following the provisions of the law or departing from the controversial constitution of the law and constitution, in the present case, nominated Unable to point to weakness or corruption in order, review request rejected

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015

• SHAHABUDDIN v. MUHAMMAD HASHIM KHAN 2015 PCrLJ 81
• KHALIL MUHAMMAD v. WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF PAKISTAN through Chairman WAPDA 2015 YLR 84
• NIAZ MUHAMMAD v. ABDUL REHMAN 2015 PLD 90
• MUHAMMAD SAEED v. ABDUR RAHIM 2015 PLD 94
• Haji ZARO JAN v. DIRECTOR GENERAL, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU, KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 2015 PLD 104
• WAHAB ALI v. FRONTIER PHARMACEUTICAL (PVT.) LTD. 2015 MLD 111
• MIR FAYAZ v. NOOR BADSHAH 2015 YLR 112
• LIAQATULLAH KHAN v. State 2015 PLD 115

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2015 →

immigration advocate from Dadu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes