Defining Sections 9 and 10, the accusation against an accused is that he had prepared a fake and fake import permit on serving as an Assistant Excise and Taxation Officer, and that he had been harmed by the forgery. The public treasury charge against the other accused was that as the manager of a company, he had sent fake eleven transport permits and thus caused great damage to the state exchequer while importing cases against the accused on the basis of documents and oral evidence. The permits and the transport permit were false documents, but the prosecutor failed to prove that the prosecution's witnesses had signed the documents, which were examined to prove the suspect's signature on the alleged documents, The accused admitted in their presence the document S were not signed. They were not handwritten. The expert prosecution also failed to prove that the co-accused acted as Compa's manager at the relevant time, which allegedly sent eleven transport permit prosecutions through witnesses and documentary evidence. , They were acquitted of the charges.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
