Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YASIN versus THE STATE

The defendant, who allegedly committed double-murder in the conviction of section 302 evidence, was convicted by the trial court on two counts and sentenced to two counts of death, when against the trial court's verdict. On appeal from the accused, the accused was sentenced. The High Court confirmed it, but in each case the defendants were sentenced to life imprisonment. The accused had filed an appeal in the Supreme Court against the decision of the High Court and the Supreme Court after accepting the appeal for almost 9 years, the case was proceeded and the remand was decided by reference to the murder. He did not challenge the High Court's decision on the matter, but he prayed that the court in sentencing should maintain his life expectancy because of the earlier sentence under which he was earlier imprisoned. The sentence was pronounced. The defendant was convicted with a SU verdict that took part in his conviction. The court practically sentenced the life and liberty expectation of a 9-year term to the death penalty after being awarded a lower sentence. And that fact would be mitigated if death sentence was not taken. And in fact, the conviction was reinstated by the High Court in its first verdict, the accused was converted to life imprisonment, in his view keeping his conviction under Section 2302, PPC. The prosecution's case was completely proved by the evidence on record. registration advocate from Buchay Key lawyer