Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF ALIAS FAYYAZ HASHMI versus THE STATE

Section 2 evidence2 Appreciating the testimony Both eyewitnesses were not residents of the same area where the incident took place, so on the occasion their presence was suspected that the incident occurred in the population but anyone who was near the place. There can be no natural witness. The incident was introduced as a witness, but nothing was recorded in the record indicating the place where the deceased lived at a distance or distance from his residence, it cannot be ruled out. That the post-mortem examination was delayed. For more than twelve hours without explanation, which was enough to indicate that the complaint was not present at the time of the incident and was summoned and then made a witness, after which the body was sent to the dead body and The post-mortem inspection was suspicious of both witnesses as the suspects quarreled with the victim before being shot. E-witnesses did not try to isolate them, or there was an unmarried man to protect the victim from the clutches of the accused, and at odd hours of the night the presence of a condom on his penis revealed that the incident Didn't work. As the prosecution's witnesses described and there was a possibility that the murderer could have been killed somewhere else, but his body was thrown to the scene of the incident and after the search, the police introduced the witnesses. And was not present in the ocular account. According to him, the possibility of medical evidence cannot be ruled out that two persons participated in the killing of one armed with two weapons and the other opened fire. registration advocate from Machh lawyer