Find a Lawyer

KARIM BAKHSH versus MST. MEHRAN BIBI

Article 42 and Q 54 Convention of Conventions (Statutes of 1984 1984), Articles 117 and 120 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of title to the evidence of the property, suit of decree of consent Claims to be the owner. According to the plaintiff, the suit filed for the specific performance of the contract of sale to the plaintiff was granted in favor of his father in connection with the suit property and he was the owner of the suit land and he had filed a petition in the trial court so that Let him approve a decree. The plaintiffs were upset over the transfer of the suit in favor of her daughter in the claim filed by the plaintiff's father that the defendant's claim was that the plaintiff's father was a tenant under it and he never paid anything. ? The plaintiff's failure to bring any order in his favor failed to be brought to record when his father had previously filed a lawsuit against the defendant, nor had any of the plaintiff's copy been brought to the reactor in that case. Neither in the previous case which resulted in the alleged injunction nor in the present suit was the alleged sale contract executed in favor of the plaintiff's father, no attempt was made to verify the request in the present petition. Which was allegedly filed. Acknowledging plaintiffs' further claim by the defendant, the alleged request was made by an author who was not submitted to the trial court to prove the decision and the trial court granted the plaintiff's favor. Was. On the one hand, the appellate court and the high court had approved the same legality after which neither the plaintiff's father nor his successors in the case had any prejudice. advocates from Ranipur lawyer