MST. NAJAM-UN-NISA versus JUDGE, SPECIAL COURT CONSTITUTED UNDER ANTI-TERRORISM ACT
Sections 6, 12 and 23 of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Terrorism Act, Section 12 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. The special court dismissed the High Court's jurisdiction for the commission of the crime, as well as the transfer of the case to the jurisdiction of the accused. The triggers of the occurrence that triggered a crime, and the fact that whether or not the crime was seen on a large scale are not the only factors determining the issue whether the matter is a parameter. Came or not The key question for the commitment of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1997 is whether the crime was a victim of terrorism or a feeling of fear or insecurity among the people, or did not affect it or any of the people Did not the class commit a crime in a remote corner? No one cares in this country because of this area or any print and electronic media, killing seven people at night at home was not an incident that does not create panic among people or any class. Used to There was no factual or legal weakness under the orders of the People's Special Court or the order passed by the High Court under which the case was refused to be transferred to the Court of O. The leave to appeal the general jurisdiction was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
