Find a Lawyer

LIAQUAT ALI versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL, SIALKOT

R70 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The principles of counting the electoral dispute ballot papers were contested by the parties; Election Assisted. Applicants relinquished all the possibility of re-counting of ballot papers, as well as all other issues raised in the election petition. Any ground to be recalculated. After the recording of the evidence, the Election Tribunal rejected the election petition, which was upheld by the High Court in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction, the evidence of which was brought to the record, riot filed a case for re-counting of ballot papers. Did the Election Tribunal right after concluding all the evidence, have come to the conclusion that I was subsequently granted an application and no re-counting of ballot papers was made by the applicants? The Election Tribunal was appointed by a single High Court judge, for which the court refused to interfere in the High Judgment. The court appeals were denied attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kandhkot lawyer