Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUMTAZ AHMAD KHAN versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB


Section 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The cancellation of the withdrawal of allotment from the allotment of tube well scheme allotment under the tube well scheme was canceled by the authorities, all the courts below Trial, appeal and review dismissed. The claim filed by Altiz was that the courts below were not improperly deemed appropriate, after which the court held a meritorious suit for lack of jurisdiction of the civil courts filed by Altiz and Appeal was reviewed as well. Faced with the same fate, none of the forums below had justified the allotment on the question of jurisdiction allotment after the re-acquisition of the land after the advance was refunded to the authority and paid an installment. Did not give the High Court reasons for maintaining it. The simultaneous detection of the courts did not guarantee any kind of illegality or weakness in the order passed by the authorities. The appeal was denied by the Supreme Court

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
power of attorney advocate Lakimarwat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.