Find a Lawyer

NAZIR AHMED versus THE INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, SINDH

RR 3 and 4 (b) (iv) Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), dismissal of section 4, major penalty of dismissal of civil civil servants for negligence, cowardice and slow conduct of public duties. Sentenced to the charges of A government employee was charged, but no formal investigations were made on the basis of the nature of the allegations leveled against him, nor was the government employee given the final showcase notice before he was fined. Was. There was a charge sheet and regular inquiries against him in which he was found not guilty and he was convicted and included in the service authority, in different circumstances, in different cases for different officers. Adoption and part of the authority on such double standards and discrimination was sufficient to thwart the entire proceeding by itself. The nature of the charge against the civil servant was certainly a necessity after its investigation, but instead In this case, the shortcut method was adopted, such as against government employees against government employees. The orders were approved, kept separate, and they were ordered to be reinstated. famous supreme court advocate from Domeli lawyer