Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHUAIB versus SHARIF KHAN

A. XLI, R 27 The Appellate Court shall not be entitled to present additional evidence, whether oral or documentary, for the appeal of additional evidence on the part of the Court of Appeal, except in cases where the court may appeal Was preferred, refused to admit the evidence that should be admitted or where the appellate court needed to present a document or examine a witness so that he could be able to make a decision or another. For whatever purpose. In the other case, the court itself had the power to allow additional evidence where it felt that a decision could not be made without additional evidence. Additional evidence could, in the circumstances, be allowed only. The trial court erred in refusing to admit false evidence which should have been admitted. Where the appellate court required such documents or witnesses and was unable to make a decision without such additional evidence. And where the appellate court required such documentation for any other purpose, additional evidence could not be allowed to give a party the opportunity to find or terminate the weaker sections of the case. law firms from Tarbela lawyer