MONAZAH PARVEEN versus BASHIR AHMAD
Section 5 and 14 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Delay Contract Section 12 (2), Instead of filing an application under CPC, OIX, R13, of the former party under CPC Instead of filing an appeal against the wrong counsel counsel's trial section 12 (2), the CPC dismissed the ruling by rejecting the former parties' decision and order. The Appellate Court's order aside, it was observed that the proper course of action for the defendants was to file an appeal in the appellate court and convince the former party of the decision and decree but was dismissed. When it was banned from being taken by Pilia. The respondent was that it was the lawyer's misconduct under which the defendant tried in the wrong forum, then the legality of the delay could not be sent to the boss. This is inaccurate advice submitted by the lawyer as it was necessary for the defendant to show that the wrong forum was followed before it was dealt with properly and carefully, causing delays. Can be repented, but the defendants failed to establish that fact. The defendants submitted that reckless and reckless manner in which the appellate court was rightfully denied the delay and the leave of appeal on the basis of the High Court was denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Kot Addu lawyer