Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RAZZAK versus THE STATE

Section 409/34 of the Prevention of Corruption (Second of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 13 (a) of the Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Sections 403 and 561 of the Order of Procedure. The prosecutor in the Order of Dubai actually observed that no criminal proceedings could be initiated against the accused due to lack of evidence and wrongdoing, which, in the eyes of the law, was not a prosecution in any court on a criminal charge and was the subject of a criminal trial. Cannot create. Admittedly, the offender was not charged under Section 403 (1) of the Criminal Court, the CCP and the special court hearing the case confessed to the offense for the first time and Breath was the basis for the request. The Dubai Prosecutor's observation that this was not enforceable did not apply to the case and dispute of the defendant against the dual conviction provided by Article 13 (a) of the Constitution: on the basis of double risk was clearly wrong. Fahmy was accused, even otherwise, of being absconding and the courts would not work to help those absconding from justice who would lose their privileges / privileges and thus go on trial. The petition was not a request to stop the criminal proceedings. However, for that reason, the record did not suggest that relying on it would prove to be a waste of the case and that no charge could be retained, which is why requests to terminate the proceedings were dropped. power of attorney advocate Shahpur Chakar lawyer