Find a Lawyer

SHAHID MASOOD NADEEM versus DY. C.A.A.F., LAHORE CANTT

Section 4 West Pakistan General Clauses Act (VII of 1956), Section 21 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Measures high salary, withdrawal of overpayment. had gone. It was then put on a basic pay scale. 11 Authorities withdrew the high pay scale notification and directed the government to collect the maximum payment made to the civil servant during the employment of senior employees. The service tribunal upheld and rejected the order passed by the authority. The request made by the civil servant was that the authority could not revoke the benefit of a higher pay scale. The public servant obtained financial benefit under the authority of the competent authority, and the principle of luxuries would not be attracted to the order related to the recovery. The order for the payment of the salaries and allowances already paid to him and the extent of receipts of the allowances was unfair and the Supreme Court directed the civil servants not to apply any recovery from the public servants in respect of the pay scale. Will go us immigration advocates from Sangote lawyer