Find a Lawyer

NOOR AHMED versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN

O XLII, R 2 The appeal before the High Court against the judgment and order passed by the appellate court was not accompanied by a certified copy of the first time court decision required by the OPLI, R2, by the CPC appellant. In a submitted application, it is being requested that the certified copy be made available as soon as it is available and the trial court's decision and decree will be discharged over time to file the certified copy. Along with the petition, the court did not pass any order on the said petition along with the memorandum of appeal filed in the High Court and the High Court and thus, for the first time, filed the certified copy of the decision of the court as well as did not appeal the appeal with the memorandum. However, no action was taken to ask for any order on the said petition. For more than 13 years, neither did he take any action during all those long years so that after 13 years of filing a case, the record would be kept on the respondents for a copy of the trial court's decision. The regular second appeal raised the initial objection to the restoration of the said appeal for non-compliance with the mandatory requirements of the OXLII, R2, CPC appellants, however, the required law was complied with after the period. ? After 14 years of filing an appeal and five months after the respondent raised the objection, the High Court had not passed any order before or after the deadline and allowed the copy of the decision to be entered into the question. And basically dismissed the appeal. Appeal due to gross negligence in filing and prosecuting appellants before the High Court famous lower court advocate from Tharo Shah lawyer