Find a Lawyer

W.T.AS. NOS.885/LB TO 890/LB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 18TH SEPTEMBER, 2002. versus W.T.AS. NOS.885/LB TO 890/LB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 18TH SEPTEMBER, 2002.

Sections 18 (1) (a), 35, 17 and 14 (1) (a) were punished with a tax equivalent to the approval of the Additional Commissioner inspecting for covert correction, as per earlier The increase was based on the fixed period. In addition to the provisions of the law, as well as the inspection of the Additional Commissioner by amending section 35 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963 relating to the inspection of the Audit Authorities, also the purpose of imposing penalties for default when passing an order under section 18 Was very familiar with the existing provisions. 1) (a) The real right of the assessee to the Wealth Tax Act, 1963 was secured in the light of the penal orders; by no means was it entitled to the jurisdiction under section 35 of the Wealth Tax Act 1963. ? And was appropriate for the penalty imposed under section 14 (1) (a) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963, and has already been paid by the SC orders under s. Action 18 (1) (a) and 35 of the Wealth Tax Act 1963 was vacated and the original orders were restored by the appellate tribunal. immigration advocates contact from Abdul Hakim lawyer