Find a Lawyer

AHMAD SAEED ALIAS SAEED BHARAM versus THE STATE

Definition of Section 302 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Sections 164 and 510 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13D. According to the law, confessional statements of the accused were given in accordance with the law, but his status was waived. In the case of extreme caution and caution, it is stated that statements should not be acted upon unless validated by other reliable and credible evidence of the prosecution's witnesses who feared after the incident. Due to the move to other cities, only came a year and a half later when their statements were recorded under section 164, the explanation given by the CCP only for the delay was that they were frightened and that they were afraid. They decided to go back to the village because they did not want to act as witnesses in question. This inadequate explanation of the delay and their eyewitness account There was a vault. Can't accept that such an incident can be satisfied with another contentious material identity test that takes place a year and a half later. , Could not be accepted by eyewitnesses as a positive identification of the suspects, with unexpected delay of three to six months in sending the recovered weapons from the accused, the vacancies found on the occasion of ballistic test raised some suspicion. Whether these were the only weapons seized. The accused ballistic report, in the circumstances, could not be considered as a positive correctional material prosecution, in which case, the defendant was acquitted, after failing to prove the case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt, in this case. I was convicted of a crime under Section 13D of the West advocate for immigration from Cherat lawyer