SAIFAL KHAN versus THE STATE
Definitions of Sections 2302 and 7337F (V) Evidence from the FIR version were dismissed by the complainant; the witnesses, including the injured witness, did not support the prosecution's case and even accused the court. The identity of the accused was not identified. He only told the deceased about the wounds and helped him, but he did not see who had injured the other injured and his testimony was not reliable when it was not confirmed. As such, when he himself confessed that the parties were on the run, the co-accused of the illegal conditions from which the weapons were recovered were acquitted from the trial court prosecution case. Thus, the suspects were acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from North Wazirstan lawyer