COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX WEALTH TAX, FAISALABAD versus MAZHAR HAKEEM COREJA
Section 136 Inuit Tax Rules, 1982, R3 (2) (c) Referring to the High Court Question The appellate tribunal in the facts and circumstances of the case justified whether the assessee was a full time employee of a company while he was also doing business. In its individuality, the High Court refused to consider wetlands, the question was more of an argument than a question of law. The second question was whether the tribunal justified that the assessee was also taxed because the payee was also a person? Some are entitled to a rebate, answered in the affirmative
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Sherani lawyer
