Find a Lawyer

ABDUL REHMAN QAMAR versus GOVERNMENT OF N.W.F.P.

Section 4 (1) (b) is under the provisions of Section 4 (1) (b) of the Limitations Act (IX of 1908), sections 5 and 14 times the Northwest Border Services Tribunals Act, 1974 Benefits of Remedy Treatment at Terminated Wrong Forum Instead of filing an appeal before the service tribunal against the penalties imposed by the Department Authority, the civil court made a civil servant before filing a lawsuit against the wrongful counsel of a public servant. Delays taken on behalf of the plaintiff requested that the wrong forum of the lawyer be contacted at the wrong forum on Section 4 of the Northwestern Frontier Province Service Tribunals Act, 1974 ( 1) The validity bar under the provisions of (b) was not applicable to the treatment of an appeal before a service tribunal for the legality of punishment awarded to civil servants under the Northwestern Frontier Province. Falsely filing before civil court on the pretext of misleading government employees (talent and discipline) Rules, 1973 will not be an excuse. Exclude time spent searching for this remedy before going to the wrong forum. There can be no exception to this rule that there was no valid ground for voluntary delayed treatment prior to the wrong forum, therefore, the appeal was barred by the service tribunal. Not guilty of any legal defect, Supreme Court refuses to interfere with decision passed by the service tribunal advocates from Digri lawyer